WBC Statement: An “A” Sample the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (“VADA”) collected from Ms. Alejandra Jimenez on January 10, 2020, the day before her bout against Franchon Crews Dezurn for the World Boxing Council (“WBC”) Word Female Super Middleweight Championship, yielded an adverse analytical finding. The WBC honored Ms. Jimenez request to witness the opening of the “B” Sample container, which took place on February 19, 2020.
Ms. Jimenez has been informed that the test of the sample in the “B” sample container confirmed the adverse analytical finding of the “A” sample.
Accordingly, in light of the adverse analytical finding of the samples in the “A” and “B” sample containers and pending the outcome of the WBC’s investigation and adjudicatory process, the WBC is hereby maintaining its provisional suspension of the WBC’s recognition of Alejandra Jimenez as WBC Female Super Middleweight Champion.
The WBC has notified Ms. Jimenez that, as part of the WBC CBP Results Management Procedure, it is affording her and her team the opportunity to present any available information and materials, and any exculpatory evidence they might deem appropriate.
Top Boxing News
PLEASE READ
We have a few rules to make our comment section more enjoyable for everyone.
1. Keep comments related to boxing.
2. Be respectful, polite and keep it clean.
3. Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Offending posts will be removed.
Repeat offenders will be put on moderation.
We have a few rules to make our comment section more enjoyable for everyone.
1. Keep comments related to boxing.
2. Be respectful, polite and keep it clean.
3. Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Offending posts will be removed.
Repeat offenders will be put on moderation.
Change the results to a NC or ND, and give the titles back to Franchon. That would be the right call.
Exculpatory evidence, like receipts from Canelo’s Butcher?
Pity her surname isn’t canello or mayweather as there would be no arguments then…….
He (Jimenez) is a cheat!
I knew there was something behind that bubbly personality.
A finding is a finding and no room for allowances should be permitted in here whatsoever, despite the so called exculpatory evidences that they mention in here. The only way that this should be taken as an unfortunate event against Jimenez is that a respectable doctor comes forward and confirm that the finding is part of a medicine prescribed to her, otherwise she should be sanctioned accordingly.
And please folks, a bit of respect about her sexual orientation will not hurt. Don’t forget that the essential part of a mature person is to show it when is expressing their thoughts publicly