I get where Willie sees the similarities of Pryor-Broner: Their names both start with “A”, and end with “R”. Nice! But seriously Pryor just had so many real accomplishments and skills Broner doesn’t. On the championship level in that era and days prior (get it?) real champs fought and defended titles frequently. 8 title retentions from 9 fights in a 3 year span at 140 before moving up. And those names are much better than broner’s. Wins over the likes of Alexis Arguello when he was the underdog. Broner’s wins are mostly sub to very sub par challengers, and he is almost always the favorite. It’s tough for most champs to win by KO, but Pryor did that. won all those 140lb title fights by KO. Broner is only 1-0 at 140 title fights. Pryor was a real pro with discipline to campaign at the same weightclass for many fights. Broner is something like 6-1 in titlefights but that spans 4 weight classes. Thus the BS 4 division titlist stat. But a better cherry picker you will never find. He cuts and runs before the real contenders or unification fights arrive. Pryor was a real champion. Broner is a mere prize fighter trying to just stay out of self imposed dept. Oh, I forgot, they are from the same city there is that I’m sure the old school boxing people from Cincinnati view Broner as merely nothing but successful and entertaining. Pryor was the real deal but we are living in the now, so you have to take what you can get. I’ll just back Robert Easter Jr instead. He potentially could come out with a better career than Broner. Potentially.